Boosting Team Creativity with the “I’m Better Than You” Mindset: A Debated Topic

The concept of a team working together towards a shared goal is a powerful image. It brings to mind images of collaboration, creativity, and innovation. However, some suggest that a dose of internal competition within the team might be necessary to foster creativity and push individuals to do their best work. This perspective is often referred to as the “I’m better than you” mindset.

In this article, we will explore the debated topic of whether the “I’m better than you” mindset helps or hinders team creativity.

Understanding the “I’m Better Than You” Mindset

The “I’m better than you” mindset is a belief that one’s own abilities and achievements are superior to those of others. Individuals who adopt this mindset strive to outperform their colleagues in order to prove their worth and value.

Some argue that this competitive mindset can be beneficial in the workplace by fostering creativity, pushing individuals to go beyond their limits, and encouraging a healthy sense of self-confidence.

Potential Benefits of the “I’m Better Than You” Mindset in Boosting Team Creativity

One potential benefit of the “I’m better than you” mindset is that it can encourage individuals to push themselves outside of their comfort zones and take risks in their work. By striving to be the best, individuals may feel more motivated to experiment with new ideas and approaches, leading to greater creativity and innovation within the team.

Additionally, a healthy sense of internal competition can encourage individuals to challenge themselves and each other, leading to stronger problem-solving skills and more effective decision-making.

Potential Drawbacks of the “I’m Better Than You” Mindset in Boosting Team Creativity

However, there are several potential drawbacks to the “I’m better than you” mindset that may hinder team creativity.

First, this mindset can lead to an unhealthy level of competition and rivalry within the team. Rather than working collaboratively towards a shared goal, individuals may become more focused on outperforming their colleagues, leading to a breakdown in communication and teamwork.

Additionally, this mindset may lead individuals to focus solely on their own achievements rather than the greater good of the team. This can lead to a lack of teamwork, collaboration, and communication, ultimately stifling creativity and innovation.

Finding a Balance

While the “I’m better than you” mindset may have some potential benefits in boosting team creativity, it is important to find a balance between internal competition and collaboration.

Rather than focusing solely on individual achievements, individuals should work together as a team towards a shared goal. They should celebrate each other’s achievements and strengths, while also challenging each other to grow and improve.

In order to foster a healthy level of internal competition, individuals can set personal goals for themselves and work to achieve them within the context of the team’s goals. By focusing on personal growth and improvement, individuals can push themselves while still working collaboratively with their colleagues.


The “I’m better than you” mindset is a debated topic when it comes to boosting team creativity. While there are potential benefits to internal competition, such as pushing individuals to take risks and challenge themselves, there are also potential drawbacks, such as a breakdown in communication and teamwork.

Ultimately, finding a balance between internal competition and collaboration is key to fostering creativity and innovation within a team. By working towards shared goals while still challenging ourselves and each other to grow and improve, we can create a more supportive and creative environment for all.


Related Posts

  1. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
  2. Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell ideastorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226-244.
  3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  4. Hargadon, A., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484-500.
  5. Keller, R. T. (2008). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 237-257.
  6. Keller, R. T. (2014). Collaboration and creativity in product innovation teams: Effects of member diversity, cohesion, and social network centrality. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33, 22-36.
  7. Mullane, J. V. (2002). The ultimate competitive advantage of continuing to learn. Strategy & Leadership, 30(3), 18-21.
  8. Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (2008). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 64-75.
  9. Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55-77.
  10. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
  11. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied psychology, 51(3), 355-387.
  12. Zhou, J., & Hoever, I. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 333-359.