Building Strong Communities while Celebrating Diversity: Ways to Avoid the “Better Than” Attitude

No community can thrive unless it is inclusive and celebrates diversity. Everyone’s unique experiences, cultures, and identities enrich our communities and can help us build a stronger, more unified society. However, sometimes we can fall into the trap of thinking that one group or individual is “better than” others, leading to division and weakened connections.

In this article, we will explore ways to avoid the “better than” attitude and build strong communities while celebrating diversity.

Understanding the “Better Than” Attitude

The “better than” attitude is a belief that one group, culture, or individual is inherently superior to others. This can lead to the exclusion or marginalization of those who are perceived as different, creating a sense of division, animosity, and disconnection within society.

Embracing Diversity

To avoid the “better than” attitude, it is important to embrace and celebrate diversity in all its forms. This means recognizing and valuing the unique experiences, cultures, and identities that each individual brings to the table.

By embracing diversity, we can create a more inclusive environment where everyone feels valued and heard. We can learn from one another, grow together, and ultimately build stronger, more connected communities.

Building Trust and Understanding

Building trust and understanding is key to avoiding the “better than” attitude. This means taking the time to listen to others’ perspectives and experiences, even if they differ from our own.

By actively seeking out diverse voices and opinions, we can broaden our understanding of the world and build stronger connections with those around us. This also requires being open to feedback and constructive criticism, and being willing to acknowledge and address any biases or prejudices we may hold.

Challenging Stereotypes and Prejudices

Another way to avoid the “better than” attitude is by challenging stereotypes and prejudices within ourselves and others. This means recognizing harmful or negative beliefs we may hold about certain groups or individuals, and actively working to change them.

By challenging stereotypes and prejudices, we can create a more inclusive and welcoming environment for all. We can also help break down barriers and foster greater understanding and empathy among different groups.

Creating Opportunities for Connection and Collaboration

Finally, creating opportunities for connection and collaboration is key to avoiding the “better than” attitude. This means actively seeking out opportunities to work and connect with those who are different from us.

By collaborating with others, we can build stronger, more diverse networks that can help us achieve shared goals and address common challenges. We can also learn from one another and build a sense of trust and connection that can help us overcome any divisions or misunderstandings.


Building strong communities while celebrating diversity requires a commitment to embracing diversity, building trust and understanding, challenging stereotypes and prejudices, and creating opportunities for connection and collaboration. By avoiding the “better than” attitude, we can create a more inclusive and welcoming society where everyone feels valued and heard. Remember, our differences are what make us unique and valuable, and by celebrating them, we can build stronger, more connected communities for all.


Related Posts

  1. Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Purdie-Vaughns, V., Steele, C. M., Davies, P. G., Ditlmann, R., & Crosby, J. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(4), 615.
  3. Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied psychology, 55(3), 303-332.
  4. Plaut, V. C., Garnett, F. G., & Buffardi, L. E. (2011). Diversity climate and psychological safety at work: The effects on work group solidarity and job satisfaction. Journal of occupational health psychology, 16(3), 324.
  5. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual review of psychology, 49(1), 65-85.
  6. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Basic books.
  7. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis’. European journal of social psychology, 16(5), 389-402.
  8. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
  9. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, 61, 76.
  10. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285-358.
  11. Robinson, S. K., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658-672.